Login
Mission Statement

Dedicated to providing regular (well, as regular as our workload permits) updates concerning legal and regulatory events impacting the regulation of the business of insurance in the State of California.

No Attorney-Client Relationship or Legal Advice

This journal is for general informational purposes only.  By using this journal, you agree that the information herein does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any of the authors or guest contributors of this journal and/or Barger & Wolen LLP.  This journal should not be considered a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information herein may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. The opinions expressed throughout this journal are the opinions of the individual author and/or contributor and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other author, contributor or any attorney of Barger & Wolen LLP.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

Search
Prior Approval
« The Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act & State Regulation of Credit Scoring: Chartered & Unchartered Territory for Insurance Companies Post Safeco v. Burr | Main | Barger & Wolen Launches Official Firm Blog on Insurance Litigation and Regulatory Law »
Monday
Jul062009

California Supreme Court Holds that Class Action Requirements Apply to UCL Claims Brought on Behalf of Others

The California Supreme Court made clear in two recent decisions that class action requirements apply to UCL claims brought on behalf of others.  In light of the California voters' express intent in enacting Proposition 64, this holding is not particularly surprising.  For more on these cases (Arias and Amalgamated), please take a look here at a post by one of my firm's blog sites.