Login
Mission Statement

Dedicated to providing regular (well, as regular as our workload permits) updates concerning legal and regulatory events impacting the regulation of the business of insurance in the State of California with a particular focus upon the property and casualty and workers' compensation lines.

No Attorney-Client Relationship or Legal Advice

This journal is for general informational purposes only.  By using this journal, you agree that the information herein does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any of the authors or guest contributors of this journal and/or Barger & Wolen LLP.  This journal should not be considered a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information herein may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. The opinions expressed throughout this journal are the opinions of the individual author and/or contributor and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other author, contributor or any attorney of Barger & Wolen LLP.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

Search
Prior Approval
« Notes on CDI's Workshop on Suggested Revisions to Prior Approval Regulations | Main | Insurance Caselaw Roundup (11/14/08) »
Tuesday
25Nov

CDI Announces New Proposed Revisions to Prior Approval Regs and Invites Pre-Notice Public Discussion

Earlier this month, the CDI issued a notice advising the industry of a hearing in early December in which it will invite prenotice public discussions on contemplated revisions to the prior approval rate regulations.  These regulations, which have already gone through significant change in the last couple of years, sets forth the procedures for companies to follow in submitting a rate application.

There are a number of changes that will most certainly prompt "discussion."  For instance, the CDI contemplates the development of a maximum and minimum efficiency standard, which creates a range in which a company's actual expense ratio is compared and, if the actual expense ratio falls within the range, that ratio is used in lieu of the efficiency standard.  The CDI also proposes a removal of the regulation that permits the Commissioner to increase or decrease the maximum permitted after tax rate of return (by 2%) based upon financial market conditions.  The CDI also proposes a removal of the "higher quality of service" variance and the addition of an "higher financial investment in underserved communities" variance.

Another proposed revision that is worthy of note is the CDI's contemplated definition of "enterprise as a whole" to mean "the insurer's operations in all lines of insurance which are subject to this Article and which are conducted in California" to be used in connection with a confiscation/constitutional variance analysis.  As this issue had been the subject of substantial debate (and disagreement) in recent rate hearings, this proposed definition will like engender much discussion at the hearing.

These and other changes can be seen here.   The hearing will take place on December 9, 2008, starting at 10:00 am at the Administrative Hearing Room, which is at the CDI's San Francisco Office, 45 Fremont Street, 22nd Floor.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.