Login
Mission Statement

Dedicated to providing regular (well, as regular as our workload permits) updates concerning legal and regulatory events impacting the regulation of the business of insurance in the State of California with a particular focus upon the property and casualty and workers' compensation lines.

No Attorney-Client Relationship or Legal Advice

This journal is for general informational purposes only.  By using this journal, you agree that the information herein does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any of the authors or guest contributors of this journal and/or Barger & Wolen LLP.  This journal should not be considered a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information herein may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. The opinions expressed throughout this journal are the opinions of the individual author and/or contributor and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other author, contributor or any attorney of Barger & Wolen LLP.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Prior Approval
« Insurance Caselaw Roundup (11/14/08) | Main | Court Holds that "Safe-Harbor" Doctrine May Be Based on Regulations, Not Just Statutes »
Wednesday
29Oct

CDI Releases Data on Trends in HO and Auto Insurance Fraud

Last week, the CDI posted some data concerning trends in homeowners and auto insurance fraud in response to inquiries regarding the same and its potential link to a slowing economy.  (The CDI's post is here.)

Though the CDI notes that it does not discern a "significant change in trends regarding automobile and homeowners insurance fraud," it is worth noting that the 2008 year is not yet over and there appears to be an uptick in the number of suspicious residential fires reported by insurers from last year.

The CDI also sets forth the number of arrests that the CDI has made for vehicle arsons and homeowners insurance fraud from 2005, which remained level throughout those years and, as for HO fraud in 2008, seemed to drop.  It is questionable, however, how much reliance can be placed upon these "arrest" numbers as reflective of the number of fraudulent claims that may be made upon the industry.  The number of arrests that the CDI may be able to make could, in part, be limited by what resources the CDI may have in conducting its investigation.  These numbers also presume that efforts to make such arrests remained on level throughout that period of time.

The data does not appear to address issues concern suspicious non-arson vehicle claims.  Also, not addressed by the post is whether claim frequency in general goes up in a slow economy.  It would seem logical that in a slow economy, individuals are more apt to make claims, fraudulent or not, as there may be less desire or means to pay for a loss out of pocket.  [If anyone is aware of a study/analysis linking claims frequency with a slowing economy, please let me know, as I would love to see it.]


EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.