Login
Mission Statement

Dedicated to providing regular (well, as regular as our workload permits) updates concerning legal and regulatory events impacting the regulation of the business of insurance in the State of California.

No Attorney-Client Relationship or Legal Advice

This journal is for general informational purposes only.  By using this journal, you agree that the information herein does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and any of the authors or guest contributors of this journal and/or Barger & Wolen LLP.  This journal should not be considered a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information herein may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. The opinions expressed throughout this journal are the opinions of the individual author and/or contributor and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other author, contributor or any attorney of Barger & Wolen LLP.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

Search
Prior Approval
« California Supreme Court to Address Administrative Exemption to Claims Adjusters (Well, Maybe) | Main | The Commissioner Orders the Maintenance of WC Pure Premium Rates »
Wednesday
Dec052007

Update on Trends toward Modernizing Rate Regulation

The Insurance Information Institute (III) came out with an issue update in which it identifies a trend by regulatory agencies in jurisdictions across the nation moving toward stream-lining the rate regulation process and relying more on a competitive rating environment (as opposed to the prior approval system we have in California) to keep rates low for consumers.  (The issue update can be found here.)   The update contains very interesting information, particularly in that it indirectly highlights the inefficient and typically expensive process now in place in California under its prior approval laws.  In light of the CDI's recent reinitiated discussions and pending workshop to augment and/or clarify what it has observed as unclear variance regulations (which were already previously discussed and hashed out in workshop), it begs the question of whether or not California consumers would be better served if California had a streamlined, deregulated competitive rating system.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.